Every photo in this section is copied from Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons and is in the public domain and used with permission.
Now that we have established a reasonable amount of evidence to support the fact that some mid range dinosaurs including T-Rex, and flyers like Pteranodon survived at least up into the early to mid-late Holocene in various places in the world, lets take another look at dolmens around the world as potential 'safe-rooms' that may have been used as a defensive measure against some very aggressive carnivorous predators.
This photo is licensed under the Wikimedia "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" license. Used with permission and/or used under 'public domain' and 'fair use' policies due to the nature and content of this book being research and education material.
Dolmens, in certain locations around the world are a lot more plentiful than any other megalithic structure. They are seen in European megalithic cultures densely clustered along the east coast of the Atlantic. Western European dolmens and megalithic culture are centered around France, extending to Portugal and Spain on the south, and to the British Isles on the west. They are found in Corsica, Sardinia, Provence (southern France), the southeastern peninsula of Italy, Algeria (northern Africa), and Syria (eastern Mediterranean). Along the Black sea, dolmens are densely clustered in Caucasia, Russia.
In Asia, dolmens are mostly found around the Indo-Pacific region, including India, Indonesia, Vietnam, Taiwan, China, Japan, and Korea. In South Korea, for example, there are more than 35,000 dolmens, about 40% of all the known dolmens in the world. In Northeast Asia, dolmens are clustered in the Korean Peninsula, northwestern Kyushu (Japan), and Zhejiang and Liaoning Provinces (China). In China, about 50 dolmens are found in Zhejiang Province and about 700 dolmens in Liaoning Province. In Japan, about 600 dolmens are clustered in Kyushu, near the Korean Peninsula, including Nagasaki, Saga, and Fukuoka.
This photo is licensed under the Wikimedia "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" license. Used with permission and/or used under 'public domain' and 'fair use' policies due to the nature and content of this book being research and education material.
There are scattered stone burrows in New England that are not classic dolmens, though they may have served the same purpose. There is one dolmen in Brazil, but other than that, it is generally not known in the Americas in the same configuration as discussed in this chapter for Europe and Asia.
It remains unclear when, why, and by whom the earliest dolmens were made. The oldest known dolmens are in Western Europe, where they were set in place around 7000 years ago. The oldest dolmens in the Far East are also dated to about the same time. Archaeologists still do not know who erected these dolmens, which makes it difficult to know why they did it. They are generally all regarded as tombs or burial chambers, despite the absence of clear evidence for this. Human remains, sometimes accompanied by artifacts, have been found in or close to the dolmens which could be scientifically dated. However, it has been impossible to prove that these archaeological remains date from the time when the stones were originally set in place.
There are four general styles, although each style provide many different and varied characteristics, probably based on local custom and design, as well defensive needs.
The above four photos are licensed under the Wikimedia "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" license. Used with permission and/or used under 'public domain' and 'fair use' policies due to the nature and content of this book being research and education material.
The following photos of dolmens from around the world have similar characteristics that might point to particular type use as security and defense against different type predators. The one common characteristic on all four types is the very large and very heavy cover or table top roof. Almost always the stone is a single slab, or in the case of long burrows, several very heavy stone slabs. If form follows function, the slab stone 'roof' top indicates predator attacks are from the top down.
This photo is licensed under the Wikimedia "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" license. Used with permission and/or used under 'public domain' and 'fair use' policies due to the nature and content of this book being research and education material.
This dolmen is among a group that are near the Zhane River in the Caucasus. It has a secret entrance in the rear and a false facade in the front.
The slab setting on stone posts or menhirs do not seem to have much protection from a ground attack, so the natural instinct is to assume the predator in that instance is a very large flyer that couldn't or didn't 'land' to attack, but caught its victims 'on the fly'. When the flyers were seen, everyone scurried to the nearest shelter until the predators passed.
This dolmen is one of the many on the South Korean Peninsula. To survive upright after several thousand years is a testament to how well built and balanced this particular dolmen is. This is a northern style dolmen from Chukrimri, Gochang, Jeolla-bukdo, South Korea
The above is one of the dolmens at the Gochang Jungnim-ri Dolmens that are centered in Maesan village, Gochang County, North Jeolla province in South Korea. This dolmen seems to serve a completely different purpose than the one above it. This one appears as a defense from a large ground predator, probably with a large neck and head that could not enter the small opening, and was not strong enough to move the oversized slab rock top.
This is one of the dolmens at the Gochang Jungnim-ri Dolmens that are centered in Maesan village, Gochang County, North Jeolla province in North Korea. Here again, the top slab seems to be a protective mechanism against an attack from above. The predator could not get its probably long neck and large head down far enough to attack under the slab. The sheer weight of the top slab, and the effort required to place and balance it precisely on top of its stone legs is at the least a difficult task. The weight of the slab displays in mute detail the strength of the attacker.
A distant view of Gochang dolmen of South Korea at the world heritage site. In the foreground left is the 3rd block of the Gochang dolmen site. In Chukrimri, Gochang, Jeolla-bukdo, South Korea. Like the above two dolmens, this field of broken dolmens have the same heavy top slab on short stone supports, suggesting they are used for relatively the same purpose, that is protection from very large long neck, big headed predators. This being a field group of dolmens, as so many are in this area, suggests a larger than single family population base requiring many more 'safe' rooms when big predators were in the area.
It might be relative at this time to have a discussion about 'form' following 'function' regarding these dolmens. It is almost impossible to imagine any funerary use for these type of stone structures, as has been claimed by other researchers. Most of the stone slab tops are way to heavy to be moved in place for any other than a utilitarian purpose. Primitive people, more so than their modern day counterparts, had little if any 'extra' time, energy and cost resource to construct these 5,000 to 15,000 pound structures, without the dolmens having an utility imperative purpose. Conclusions to that purpose will be discussed at the end of this section.
Dolmens in Osang-ri, Ganghwa Island, South Korea. The above field, like the photo above it, is representative of a larger population that needed relatively the same protection as other folks in the area. Suggesting of course that the population of predators was quite high in this area of South Korea.
A standard table top dolmen in South Korea. The top is so heavy, that over time the side walls, though buried quite deep have over time begin to lean with the top rock weight. This, as most of the dolmens on the South Korean peninsula has a questionable erection timescale, with some experts attributing the overall build period to start sometime right after 7,000 years ago.
The following photos of 'open' table top design from around the world are posted without further comment, with the exception of their location and license details. Please review them under the perspective of a utilitarian purpose as a defense against (more than likely) dinosaur predators.
Crucuno dolmen, in Plouharnel (Morbihan, Brittany, France). It has a 40 ton cap stone on the top. It is dated 6,000 YBP. This was originally located in the 19th century by reading engravings of a very long passage. This information is noted in a sign posted at the site itself.
Sulimalthe, Somwarpet, India
The Kilclooney Dolmen near Ardara, County Donegal, Republic of Ireland, pictured on a sunny evening in June 1986.
There is no data available on this Burren dolmen.
Mores, Sardegna, Italia
The following dolmens are from the Russian Caucasus. The first is the only surviving megalith or single stone chamber carved out of the interior of the stone. Photo is from a Russian Stamp commemorating the Sochi Winter Games.
This photo is licensed under the Wikimedia "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" license. Used with permission and/or used under 'public domain' and 'fair use' policies due to the nature and content of this book being research and education material.
Gelendzhiksky district, Russia
This is the largest single table top dolmen that I have found. I believe it is in France. Its local location is not available. The work effort to create this megalithic structure is quite extensive. The side walls must be buried deep to retain its shape when so many other buildings have succumbed to earthquakes over the same period of history. The seven wonders of the world have nearly all came and gone, while these megalithic small building retain their shape and structure. This structure must have supported a village or larger population, as it appears to be within the magnitude of 24'x12', or about 360 sq ft. On a short term basis, it would comfortably hold 40-70 women, children, the old, sick and probably the infirm or wounded.
This dolmen is also in the Caucasus, Russia. Like the photo above it is another of the 'larger' structures. Built of single monolithic slabs, this dolmen is one of the strongest and best suited defensive 'safe rooms' in the area. It appears to be somewhere in the range of 25' long and about 10' wide. The entry hole is about the same size as all the dolmen holes in this area, or about 20" in diameter. Many of the hundreds of dolmens in this area have 'plugs' that fit the hole opening, so we know they were meant to be closed up. The design is interesting, because the plugs could not be 'pushed in' but could be 'kicked out' from the inside. I am very interested in the depth the side walls are buried in the earth.
One other feature that is nearly universal for this style dolmen is the 'overhang' and protruding side walls around the entry hole. In and of itself, that feature seems to meet a universal security need, like protecting the opening (set back) from a large headed, long neck predator. Almost every dolmen in the world has this basic feature.
Conclusion
If you are interested in further data and information on the more than 130,000 dolmens around the world, please review Wikipedia as a good start. The only problem is that on the Wiki sites, too many unknowns are stipulated as 'facts'. For example, dolmens are universally accepted in Academia as 'graves or 'cairns'. While some may be, those are generally taken over and used as tombs and cairns long after the primary reason for the dolmen's original construction had passed into history.
The best information we have at the current time, which is a composite of various archaeological digs around the world, is that the dolmens were built shortly after 7,000 years ago. Some are speculated to be newer, and some folks attribute wildly eccentric dates to them. The fact is that no one knows anything about them at all. And all speculation about them is pure guess work. By their primary design, they are NOT tombs, cairns or primary funerary locations. We as a species have been burying people for about as long as we go back in history. It has always been a utilitarian process, with the exception of a few Kings and Pharaohs. The dead are almost always buried "under" the ground, or deep in the rocks as in the case of the Pharaohs. During a Hunter-Gatherer phase like that represented by the dolmen builders, it is logical to assign relative value to the effort necessary to set up very large flat rock or table top rock "rooms". Which means that the tribal group did not have the time nor resources to construct megalithic 'rooms' with very large stone table top construction unless the process had a primary survival imperative.
Now that we have established in earlier sections of this chapter that dinosaurs DID live along side hominids between the early and mid to late Holocene, the logical conclusion as to the purpose and function of 'safe rooms' was to protect the vulnerable (women and children) from large and probably ferocious carnivorous predators.
I think a reasonable conclusion can be drawn from the fact that the dolmens may be contemporary to the Last Great Cataclysm. As I make the case for a very large global population (above 4 billion) before the Last Great Cataclysm, 7,000 years ago, one of the recognizable features of that civilization is that it had a significantly high level of technology, at least enough to build some of the most elaborate canal systems on earth. Which means they had some kind of defense-weapon systems that kept the largest predators at bay. Much like the case of current Kodiak grizzly bears. If you go hunting Kodiak Browns with a switch, you are likely to be bear snacks. But if you have a .45 LR Pistol and interchangeable .45 LR Carbine Rifle, you are probably going to have at least an equal chance up against a mad or hngry Mamma Bear. Large Dinosaur predators were probably on par with a grizzly in terms of ferocity. Although larger than a very large grizzly, some predator dinosaurs would make short work of a small to medium sized human that did not have overwhelming defensive or destructive firepower.
Some issues and characteristics attributed to dolmens, such as piled high earthen mounds around the dolmens don't seem to fit the archaeological facts. If earthen walls or stone and dirt were part of the original construction, some of the residue of that building style would still be evident in the surrounding areas of the building site. While many of the sites have scattered cut stone laying around, there is no clear evidence those stones were part of a mound or burrow system. They could and probably were part of the local buildings surrounding the dolmen. Many of the sites show this to be true, where local buildings and a plaza area in front of the dolmen show its central nature to the community.The dolmen(s) would be close, and probably in the center of the housing complex. A person as potential prey would not want to have to run very far when the predator shows up.
It makes logical sense to me, that a survivor population following the Last Great Cataclysm, 7,000 years ago would have lost most or all of its technology within a few generations, probably not more than 4 or 5, or certainly within 150 years of the event. Survival at that time was a day to day enterprise, and as soon as any predators began to hunt and kill the survivors, the local tribal leader's immediate reaction would be to build some sort of impregnable 'safe room' that was not vulnerable to predator attack. The characteristics of the dolmens around the world fit that set of circumstances better than any other scenario.
John M Jensen Jr
johnmjensenjr@gmail.com
http://ancientcanalbuilders.com
http://EarthEpochs.Blogspot.com
http://earthepoch.com
https://govst.academia.edu/JohnJensen/
Excellent thinking out-of-the box. My hunch on the use of dolmens is also as a 'safe house', but for protection from synchrotronic radiation from plasma events seen in the ancient sky. However, these radiation events must have been longer term, not just a passing event, so one would think underground chambers would be better purposed.
ReplyDeleteThere is no question that a radiant heat index occurred between 11,200 YBP and 7,000 YBP. During that short 4K year period, the 3rd Ice Melt Pulse added about 195' to the already increased Ocean Level. Dr. Robert Schoch estimates a minimum heat increase of at least 14 to 27 degrees to accommodate that rapid an Ice Melt Surge, and I fundamentally agree with him in principle. And, I have no doubt that may have included other solar anomalies (radiation, electromagnetic pulse events, etc., though little evidence of that shows in Ice core drilling.
ReplyDeleteHowever, that set of facts does not impact the dolmens to any significant level, as the best we can tell is the dolmens were generally built just under -7K years ago. Different event windows. If the megalithic builders at that time frame could only construct dolmens as safe-rooms, they probably lost their earlier technologies, which had included protective weapons, as well as some technology which might predict coming electromagnetic pulses and other solar or galactic events that probably were not necessarily visible to the naked eye.
My opinion is that underground cities and large labyrinth tunnel systems are constructed as safe living zones during the heat/solar damage of the 3rd Meltwater Pulse. Cappadocia in Turkey is a good example of that. In fact that is the case I am making in my book.
Underground cities that housed up to 80,000 people are NOT primarily safe zones from marauders, although they served that purpose on a secondary basis. Because it is too easy for the attackers to find the air vents, plug them up and smoke the residents out. So it was not an effective defense against hominid attackers. Regardless of the external ambient temperatures, underground temperatures maintain a livable cool temperature and appear to be much more 'habitation' related than the dolmen. After several years of studying the dolmen systems, I will stick with my analysis.
this is astounding. and, as i was reading i couldnt help but to also consider Michael Steinbackers suggestion of an electriomagnetic catastrophic event creating plasmatic bursts of great magnitude to disrupt earth plates, tremendous ancient super volcanos (see Dr. Steve Austins work) catapulting fire rock into atmosphere, raining down (human and dinosaur).....my questions - 1) are these dolmens all erected around the same time period? (2) are there dolmens in Americas? (See Jim Vierias work in New England) (3) if these shelters were built after the Dulge then these primitive quick shelters were most certainly protective against dying out, very hungry dinosaurs and temperatures turning very cold!
ReplyDeleteThere are a couple of standing stone anomalies in North America that may have been dolmens and the 'bunker' style covered caverns in New England may have served some similar purpose. There is one dolmen found in South America. Based on residue 14c dating of material in the close vicinity of dolmens in both South Korea and Europe, they seem to be all of a general time period roughly just after 7K years ago. (6,800 YBP)
ReplyDeleteActually the temperature did not turn 'very cold' following the cataclysm of 7,000 years ago. It stabilized after a 4,000 year period of a very hot (14 to 24 degree higher than now) heat index. Called the 'third meltwater pulse', that period between 11,200 and 7K YBP accounted for more than 195' of ocean rise, which is about 5' every hundred years. The Zep Tepi record their calendar as being 288 days during that period. So the Earth was closer to the Sun at that time. (Higher heat index and a shorter solar year means the Earth moved closer to the Sun, then moved back to a solar year of 360 days during the 7K YBP event.) I have yet to understand the driver mechanism of those two moves. As cataclysms occurred almost exactly 1,000 years apart between 15,000 and 11,000 YBP, it seems logical to assign some planet or planetoid 'fly-by' event as the driver mechanism.
The dolmens and other megaliths (pyramids, cromlechs, and others) were built for defense. Read more http://forum.ozersk.ru/topic/32337-raskritie-tain-drevnosti/
ReplyDelete